MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 37612 |
Device Problems
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Battery Problem (2885)
|
Patient Problem
Shaking/Tremors (2515)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient saw their neurologist about 3 weeks ago, who checked it out, and they were told the implant "went to sleep," and they needed to wake it up.The caller said nothing happened when they tried to recharge the implant, and they didn't know when the issue started.The caller said they called the manufacturer representative (rep) and were told to call and get a new programmer and a recharger; later, the caller said their doctor told them to replace the equipment.Tried to clarify the reason they needed the equipment replaced, but the caller didn't know.Asked the caller to put the charger on the ins and press the green button, and the caller described the repositioning antenna screen.Asked the caller to try again, and they said the patient was shaking.Reviewed the recharging process, and the caller tried to start charging the ins.The caller described the repositioning antenna screen.The caller said they didn't know when the date of the last time the patient last successfully recharged their ins (the patient told them a couple of weeks).Reviewed if the doctor told them it was in a sleep state about 3 weeks ago; it might have been longer than 3 weeks ago. reviewed brief over-discharge information (od).They were redirected to their doctor to resolve od.At this point in the call, the caller said the patient's condition had worsened lately; they think the patient did not charge the ins because the antenna got hot and looked like it was going to catch on fire.Did not ask for the date when the patient's condition worsened as this was a very confusing call, and the caller did not know the dates or did not provide relevant information when asked for dates.The issue was not resolved.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to address the issue further.The damaged recharger/antenna was replaced (reference (b)(4)).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the manufacturer¿s representative (rep) reported they still needed to meet with the patient to interrogate the device and confirm the issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|