• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number L331
Device Problems Pacing Problem (1439); Battery Problem (2885)
Patient Problems Atrial Flutter (1730); Chest Pain (1776); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Dyspnea (1816); Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Dizziness (2194); Anxiety (2328); Discomfort (2330); Presyncope (4410); Heart Block (4444); Unspecified Heart Problem (4454); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/27/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was that the patient with this pacemaker experienced increased heart rate at 100s beats per minute (bpm) all the time.In addition, this patient went to the emergency room (er) and consult transmission showed increased heart rate and sent home as it was not life threatening.Patient was being seen again in the hospital experienced fluttering in the chest and told by the physician that the atrial was going too fast and ventricular needed to be paced.Boston scientific technical services (ts) discussed basic function of a single chamber device versus a dual chamber device and referred to the implanting physician.Additional information received indicated that this patient experienced constant pain and discomfort.The health care professional felt the threshold test when started at 7.5 volts.Patient did have a complete heart block and so was paced all the time with 2.8 volts@0.4 milliseconds in the right ventricle (rv) and 100% paced.Moreover, device power consumption was noted to be a bit high.Device data analysis was requested and showed that this device was unclear if it operated normally.The power consumption appears normal for the most part but has periods of high usage.Suspected cause may be due to radio frequency use.Furthermore, ts recommended to do another remote transmission to check power consumption.As of this time, this device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was that the patient with this pacemaker experienced increased heart rate at 100s beats per minute (bpm) all the time.In addition, this patient went to the emergency room (er) and consult transmission showed increased heart rate and sent home as it was not life threatening.Patient was being seen again in the hospital experienced fluttering in the chest and told by the physician that the atrial was going too fast and ventricular needed to be paced.Boston scientific technical services (ts) discussed basic function of a single chamber device versus a dual chamber device and referred to the implanting physician.Additional information received indicated that this patient experienced constant pain and discomfort.The health care professional felt the threshold test when started at 7.5 volts.Patient did have a complete heart block and so was paced all the time with 2.8 volts@0.4 milliseconds in the right ventricle (rv) and 100% paced.Moreover, device power consumption was noted to be a bit high.Device data analysis was requested and showed that this device was unclear if it operated normally.The power consumption appears normal for the most part but has periods of high usage.Suspected cause may be due to radio frequency use.Furthermore, ts recommended to do another remote transmission to check power consumption.As of this time, this device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.It was reported that this patient experienced increased heart rate post implant of this pacemaker.This patient presented to the emergency room (er) in which a transmission confirmed increased heart rate.This patient was sent home at that time as it was not life threatening.Patient was being seen again in the hospital experiencing fluttering in the chest and was told by the physician that the atrium was working too fast, and the ventricle needed to be paced.It was noted that this patient experienced constant pain and discomfort and could feel the threshold testing while it occurred.This patient has complete heart block and was pacemaker dependent.It was suspected that this icd was exhibiting high power consumption.A request was made for disk analysis which noted it was unclear if this was normal operation.The power consumption appeared normal with periods of high usage and was suspected to be due to radio frequency.Ts recommended an additional remote transmission to verify power consumption however, that the power consumption does not explain this patients symptoms.Technical services (ts) discussed basic function of a single chamber device versus a dual chamber device and referred this patient to their implanting physician.Then, the patient noted they experienced a near syncopal episode after using a garmin watch and starkey hearing aids.The patient reported that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed on them however, no details are known at this time.This patient has called in several times with a list of symptoms including chest pain, fluttering, shortness of breath, dizziness, difficulty swallowing, tightness in left shoulder, palpitations.Noted that they have suffered traumatic brain injury and has an extremely high level of anxiety.This patient mentioned they knew where the leads were located and that they would remove them themselves.This patient alleges that this pacemaker has caused all their health issues and is not right for them.As of this time, this icd remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE MRI EL DR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key15910288
MDR Text Key305876503
Report Number2124215-2022-50553
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526559266
UDI-Public00802526559266
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150012/S000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberL331
Device Catalogue NumberL331
Device Lot Number548555
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/10/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/02/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/07/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-