|
The healthcare professional reported that during an emergent coil embolization procedure with the target lesion located at the left gastric artery, the parent catheter(s) accessed the celiac and a progreat® microcatheter (terumo) accessed the target lesion.Interlock(s) and pushable coil(s) embolized the lesion, and ¿detachable was used for the proximal region as well.¿ a 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410) was winded and implanted.After that, the same size coil(s) were used.However, when one of the complaint coils, a 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410 / 30624682) was used, there was resistance felt inside the microcatheter and ¿winding was impossible.¿ the complaint coil was resheathed, but it became unraveled inside the microcatheter.The microcatheter was replaced and the coil was replaced with a 3mm x 6cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120306 / 30747539), but the replacement coil also became unraveled inside the replacement microcatheter.It was reported that continuous flush was maintained.The microcatheter was replaced and competitor coil(s) were used.The procedure was completed without any negative patient impact.On 04-dec-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the guidewire used was an asahi meister guidewire (asahi intecc).The y-connector was an okay ii (nipro).The reported event did not result in any clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Procode is krd/hcg.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address is not available / reported.Conclusion: the healthcare professional reported that during an emergent coil embolization procedure with the target lesion located at the left gastric artery, the parent catheter(s) accessed the celiac and a progreat® microcatheter (terumo) accessed the target lesion.Interlock(s) and pushable coil(s) embolized the lesion, and ¿detachable was used for the proximal region as well.¿ a 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410) was winded and implanted.After that, the same size coil(s) were used.However, when one of the complaint coils, a 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410 / 30624682) was used, there was resistance felt inside the microcatheter and ¿winding was impossible.¿ the complaint coil was resheathed, but it became unraveled inside the microcatheter.The microcatheter was replaced and the coil was replaced with a 3mm x 6cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120306 / 30747539), but the replacement coil also became unraveled inside the replacement microcatheter.It was reported that continuous flush was maintained.The microcatheter was replaced and competitor coil(s) were used.The procedure was completed without any negative patient impact.On 04-dec-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the guidewire used was an asahi meister guidewire (asahi intecc).The y-connector was an okay ii (nipro).The reported event did not result in any clinically significant delay in the procedure.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30747539) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.Coil unraveling / stretching is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) provides proper handling instructions for the device to prevent such issues from occurring.With the information available and without the product available to be returned for analysis, the reported issue in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the review of the manufacturing documentation, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2022-00760.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|