|
EXACTECH, INC. TRULIANT TIB IMP CRC INSERT SZ 4.5,10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED,
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
TRULIANT TIB IMP CRC INSERT SZ 4.5,10MM |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Implant Pain (4561)
|
| Date of Event |
11/08/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant medical products: 02-020-14-0345 - truliant cr por fem cr por right sz 4.5, 6724408, 02-022-55-4545 - truliant por tib tray size 4.5f/4.5t, 6869625, 201-78-15 - holding pin mini sharp point 4 pk, 6891722, 521-78-23 - threaded pin size 2.3 collared 2pk, s045140, 521-78-32 - threaded pin size 3.0 collarless 2pk, 5440117, s265331, 521-78-36 - threaded pin size 5.1 collarless 2pk, s223293.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a male patient, initial right knee implanted on (b)(6) 2021, underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022, approximately 1 year 3 months post the initial procedure due to paint and synovitis.Some moderate wear was noted per surgeon.The knee was a little tight in flexion, so releases were performed and a thinner size 9mm insert was used with good rom and stability.The patient left in stable condition.Explant not available.No further information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After review of additional information received the following sections, have been updated accordingly: the reason for the pain and synovitis leading to the revision reported cannot be determined from the information provided, but does not appear to be related to prosthesis wear as the provided images do not show signs of wear that are inconsistent with an implanted device.Contributing factors to the revision may have been high tension of the joint during flexion and inclusion of the implanted polyethylene component in the packaging recall.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: b1, b2, b5, d1, h6: clinical code, component code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions.The reason for the pain and synovitis leading to the revision reported cannot be determined from the information provided but does not appear to be related to prosthesis wear as the provided images do not show signs of wear that are inconsistent with an implanted device.Contributing factors to the revision may have been high tension of the joint during flexion and inclusion of the implanted polyethylene component in the packaging recall.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a male patient had an initial right knee implanted and then underwent a revision procedure, approximately 1 year 3 months post the initial procedure due to paint and synovitis.Some moderate wear was noted per surgeon.The knee was a little tight in flexion, so releases were performed and a thinner size 9mm insert was used with good rom and stability.The patient left in stable condition.Explant not available.No further information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|