|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. POROUS FEMORAL COMP SIZE 5-LEFT MEDIAL; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNICOMPARTMENTAL/UNICONDYLAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1-10003-510 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
11/09/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during revision surgery of an engage partial knee system, one (1) porous femoral comp size 5-left medial, one (1) porous tibial tray size 4-left medial, one (1) tibial insert size 4-left med 9mm and one (1) tibial anchor stem size 3-4 were removed and a competitor total knee was implanted.The reason for the revision surgery is unknown.Patient's health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, a revision of the partial knee system/conversion to a competitor total knee arthroplasty (tka) was performed due to unspecified reason(s).As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been received.The photo images of explanted partial knee components provided were reviewed; however, the length of time in-vivo is unknown and therefore it is unknown if sufficient bony integration would have been anticipated.Without the requested clinical documentation, it is unknown if the instructions for use was adhered to and possible contributing clinical factors could not be definitively concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported revision/conversion to a competitor tka cannot be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for engage partial knee system revealed complete guidelines of indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions and possible adverse effects that may occur preoperative, during surgery or post operative.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that a similar event was identified due to a spike in the complaints where a revision surgery was performed, and determined that the primary root cause is: insufficient surgeon and medical education training program.Furthermore, there were limited resources available to engage to complete a more detailed surgeon training program.The following actions will be performed: build robust sales training and medical education program for engage products, deliver training to active surgeon users and hold quarterly surgeon training events.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.No details of the alleged fault, malfunction or injury were provided, therefore no factors that can contribute can be delineated.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a partial knee replacement was performed by implanting an engage knee system, the patient experienced unspecified complications which were treated by removing the mentioned system: one (1) porous femoral comp size 5-left medial, one (1) porous tibial tray size 4-left medial, one (1) tibial insert size 4-left med 9mm and one (1) tibial anchor stem size 3-4.A competitor's total knee system was implanted.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the device were not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The photographs were reviewed, did not reveal any defects.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been received.The photo images of explanted partial knee components provided were reviewed; however, the length of time in-vivo is unknown and therefore it is unknown if sufficient bony integration would have been anticipated.Without the requested clinical documentation, it is unknown if the instructions for use was adhered to and possible contributing clinical factors could not be definitively concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported revision/conversion to a competitor total knee arthroplasty cannot be determined.No further medical assessment could be rendered at this time.A review of the production records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history based on the historical data revealed similar previous events, however, no commonalities that would suggest a device deficiency were found.A review of the instructions for use documents for engage partial knee system revealed complete guidelines of indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions and possible adverse effects that may occur preoperative, during surgery or post operative.There is not enough data available to conclude that the overall clinical benefit outweighs the potential risk profile when compared to the state of the art.The existing data identifies a potential signal that the performance is an outlier vs the state of the art with respect to the risk for revision.In addition, a historical review concluded that no previous escalated actions for this type of issue were identified.However, as a correction action a voluntary market removal will be performed for the engage cementless partial knee system due recent complaint data that indicates that the revision rate may be trending higher than corresponding similar devices in global joint replacement registries.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.No details of the alleged fault, malfunction or injury were provided, therefore no factors that can contribute can be delineated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action may be indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|