|
As originally reported, prior to use during preparation of the device, a kink was noted on an amplatz extra-stiff support wire guide.The package was not damaged and the device was stored vertically.The wire was not altered by the user.The device was not used, and another device from the same lot was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse effects to the patient.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the mandril was protruding from a kink in the wire.
|
|
Pma/510(k) number: pre-amendment.Device evaluated by mfg = other (81) - device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as originally reported, prior to use during preparation of the device, a kink was noted on an amplatz extra-stiff support wire guide.The package was not damaged, and the device was stored vertically.The wire was not altered by the user.The device was not used, and another device from the same lot was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse effects to the patient.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the mandril was protruding from a kink in the wire.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The device was kinked near the tip, and the safety wire was protruding from the coils.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.There have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.One relevant non-conformance was noted on the lot for one device that was kinked/bent; however, the device was scrapped and there are 100% inspections in place to capture this non-conformance.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that damage due to shipping and/or handling of the device likely contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|