• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENIA 3.0T; SYSTEM, NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENIA 3.0T; SYSTEM, NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING Back to Search Results
Model Number INGENIA 3.0T CX
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Burning Sensation (2146); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 11/28/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It has been reported to philips that the patient suspects of vaginal burning.Philips has started an investigation of this complaint.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: based on the information available and the testing conducted, this incident was not caused by system malfunction (no system hazard).No definitive explanation for alleged blistering can be provided.A review of the risk management file was performed and this incident reported cannot be considered being associated with the mr examination by ingenia 3.0t cx for the following reasons from a clinical perspective at this point: potential scenarios for this case are related to either skin-to-skin contact, skin-bore wall contact, or antenna effects.Some publications have reported thigh-thigh loop, or right hand-pelvis contact, but the blistering was not located in the exact area.Also, the patient was rather slim (bmi19.6) for thigh-thigh loop; any skin contacts were not observed and isolation was secured by own patient's clothes during scanning.Detailed information including the size and overall area of blistering was not provided by the patient.At this point we cannot further evaluate relatedness of this incident to the mr machine without additional information about patient¿s conditions or materials can cause antenna effects, such as local medication or cream in the area concerned, etc.There was no indication of a system malfunction including any visual irregularities or artifacts in the images taken during the heating event tested by a fse, which suggested that there were no specific materials/substances identified on images that can cause image artifacts and antenna effects.A clinical assessment review was performed and the additional information contained indicates this reported injury meets the criteria for serious injury as the injury was described as a blistering on the patient's vagina (genitals).The patient did not require additional medical treatment and declined to provide photos of the area for the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INGENIA 3.0T
Type of Device
SYSTEM, NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 6
best 5684 PC
NL  5684 PC
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 6
best 5684 PC
NL   5684 PC
Manufacturer Contact
dusty leppert
3000 minuteman rd
andover, MA 01810
6172455900
MDR Report Key15937023
MDR Text Key305039571
Report Number3003768277-2022-01405
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNH
UDI-Device Identifier00884838068452
UDI-Public884838068452
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K162931
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberINGENIA 3.0T CX
Device Catalogue Number781271
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/28/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age35 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight50 KG
-
-