• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GYRUS ACMI, INC. UROPASS AS 12/14FR X 38 CM 5/BX; URETERAL CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GYRUS ACMI, INC. UROPASS AS 12/14FR X 38 CM 5/BX; URETERAL CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 61238BX
Medical Device Problem Code Material Separation (1562)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The customer reports during a cysto-ureteroscopy procedure using a uropass ureteral access sheath dilator, the sheath tip broke off inside the patient¿s bladder when the physician was attempting to advance it over the wire into the ureter.The device fragments were retrieved.The patient did not experience any adverse effects as a result of this occurrence.The patient's current condition is reported as "stable".There were no procedural or anatomical challenges that could have contributed to the device breaking.The customer examined a like device still sealed in the package.After trying to wiggle the device inside the package, the device snapped inside the package.Additional comment by physician "additional devices were checked while in the packaging/unopened and showed same defect." one image was provided showing a device broken in the package.Clarifying information has been requested, at this time, no additional information has been provided.The customer stores the devices in sterile core hanging up the way they are designed.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the patient event.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the device broken in the package.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report has not been returned to olympus for evaluation (although it is anticipated to be).The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information: this medical device report (mdr) is related to patient identifier (b)(6).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A dhr review was performed by the original equipment manufacturer (oem).There was one nonconformity noted for tip outer diameter.The lot was then further reviewed and the lot passed with no other nonconformities.It has been over 4 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the oem investigation, the root cause was found to be embrittlement and degradation of the dilator polymer due to variable storage methods and environment exposure in health care facilities.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The customer returned all available stock, which was (b)(4) units with 6 different lot numbers.The device reported as broken in this complaint was not likely returned, as only unopened devices were returned.A research and development investigation was performed and came up with the following conclusions: uropass dilator tip breakage is proposed to be mainly caused by inconsistent manufacture process of polyethylene (pe) dilator, lot-by-lot.The unfavorable oxidation of polyethylene dilator material is proposed to be occurred during dilator manufacture thermal process cycle, in which the thermos-oxidation could cause brittle fracture of uropass dilator tip materials for special lots.Generally speaking, photooxidation of polyethylene or uropass dilator material could occur during the whole products cycle including sterilization, and shelf life.In other words, it will have affecting on uropass products for every lots but not for special lots.Uropaas dilator tip buckling testing should be very helpful for supplier to check the quality of uropass dilator tip for each lot to make sure if it meets osta specifications or not.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UROPASS AS 12/14FR X 38 CM 5/BX
Common Device Name
URETERAL CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
800 west park drive
westborough MA 01581
Manufacturer (Section G)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
9600 louisiana avenue north
brooklyn park MN 55445
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key15941611
Report Number3011050570-2022-00127
Device Sequence Number6059531
Product Code KNY
UDI-Device Identifier00821925005983
UDI-Public00821925035409
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K051593
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number61238BX
Device Lot Number09B1900153
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/10/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/28/2023
06/12/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/08/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/26/2023
07/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/11/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-