• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. CR TIBIAL INSERT SZ 3, 9MM, SLOPE ++; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. CR TIBIAL INSERT SZ 3, 9MM, SLOPE ++; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number OPTETRAK CR TIBIAL INSERT
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Joint Laxity (4526); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 01/04/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the legal brief, in (b)(6) 2012, patient (55-year-old at the time) underwent this tka surgery in his right knees where the surgeon implanted defendants¿ optetrak, cr, porous femoral component, optetrak, finned, cemented tibial tray, optetrak, cr tibial insert, and patella single peg.The allegations in this complaint relate to the early failure of the defective device, its tibial tray and its polyethylene component.The subsequent revision surgeon noted that there was catastrophic failure with fracture of the polyethylene insert as well as a tibial insert component with metal-on-metal articulation bilaterally.The components of the device were defective, unreasonably dangerous and failed resulting in loosening, malpositioning of the implant, and rubbing/wear of the components causing metallosis, instability, limited mobility, swelling and pain.The extent of the components¿ failure was discovered upon patient¿s right knee revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation results - the revisions reported may have been due to prosthesis wear/fracture of the tibial inserts, which allowed for loosening, malalignment of the implants, and metal-on-metal contact between the femoral component and tibial tray and resulted in the reported metallosis, instability, limited mobility, swelling, and pain.However, these allegations cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned for evaluation and images of the explanted devices, pre-revision radiographs, part information, and operative notes were unable to be obtained.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H6: added clinical codes, medical device code and component code d10: (b)(6) 200-73-09 - cr tibial insert sz 3, 9mm, slope ++ (b)(6) 232-03-03 - optetrak asy, cr porous femoral, sz 3, right (b)(6) 200-03-35 - one peg patella 35mm.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated/corrected: d1/d2a/d2b, d4, h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: a, b, c, e.The reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear, instability, fracture, and femoral loosening or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images and radiographs were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CR TIBIAL INSERT SZ 3, 9MM, SLOPE ++
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key15943316
Report Number1038671-2022-01586
Device Sequence Number17694689
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862041258
UDI-Public10885862041258
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K082022
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/30/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/14/2015
Device Model NumberOPTETRAK CR TIBIAL INSERT
Device Catalogue Number200-73-09
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/21/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/30/2023
Not provided
05/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/08/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/11/2023
12/02/2024
05/30/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/16/2010
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-