• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROSA SYS W/PROGAV 2.0 A.CONTROL RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROSA SYS W/PROGAV 2.0 A.CONTROL RESERV.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX991T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 11/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: a deformation of the outer housing of the prosa valve was observed through the visual inspection.The measurement of the plane parallelism could confirm that with a value of -0,064 mm the housing membrane is outside tolerance (0 ± 0.02 mm).Additionally, we could determine a bloody delivery liquid with particles and deposits in the control reservoir.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that both valves and the reservoir are permeable.Computer control test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer control testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.Because the prosa valve has a defect brake, so the pressure could not be hold and the computer control test is not possible.The progav 2.0 operated not in the accepted tolerances.An accelerated outflow could be determined.Adjustment test: both valves were tested and are adjustable to all specified pressures.The brake function is defect and the pressure could not be fixed.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function of the progav 2.0 is operated as expected.But the brake function of the prosa did not operate as expected.The results indicate that the rotor no longer performs as required.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.To make the proteins / deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: for the sake of transparency and completeness, we would like to point out that a permeability test was already performed in the hospital after the revision.Based on our examination results, we can determine damage to the prosa housing and a defective brake at the time of our examination.An accelerated outflow could be detected on the progav 2.0 valve.The cause of the accelerated outflow could be the determined deposits.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of protein can compromise the integrity of the valve.The detected deformation can be named as the cause for the defect of the brake.Excessive pressure from the adjustment pin or a blow to the patient's head can compromise the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a prosa shuntsystem with progav 2.0 (part # fx991t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in underdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 32 years.Height: 165 centimeters (cm).Weight: 110 kilograms (kg).Gender: female.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROSA SYS W/PROGAV 2.0 A.CONTROL RESERV.
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key15954736
Report Number3004721439-2022-00371
Device Sequence Number6561498
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906138493
UDI-Public4041906138493
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/08/2025
Device Model NumberFX991T
Device Catalogue NumberFX991T
Device Lot Number20047377
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/11/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/11/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/17/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age32 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight110 KG
-
-