|
From available information, there is no return material authorization (rma) associated with this complaint.Therefore, there are no isi products expected to return for evaluation.Without the returned products a failure analysis could not be performed and as such the root cause of the alleged failure could not be determined.A procedure log review was performed and the following was confirmed: system serial # (b)(4), event date ((b)(6) 2022), and procedure name (thoracic pulmonary segmentectomy).No image or video clip for the reported event was submitted to isi for review.A review of the instrument log for part #48630w-04 | batch/lot #m92220508-0699 associated with this event has been performed.Per logs, the instrument was last used on (b)(6) 2022 on system (b)(4) with 0 lives remaining.A review of the instrument log for part #470430-08 | batch/lot #t10190311-0041 associated with this event has been performed.Per logs, the instrument was last used on (b)(6) 2022 on system (b)(4) with 41 lives remaining.A review of the logs was performed by an intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) failure analysis engineer (fae).Logs showed that the stapler 30 instrument was installed twice on universal side manipulator (usm) 3.The first install was a white reload, and the second install was a blue reload.During the first install with a white reload, no clamping or firing was attempted.On the second install, the user made 2 clamp attempts, aborting the first attempt at ~13% completion.The aborted clamp was followed by an aborted unclamp after a completion of ~88%.The 2nd clamp was attempted a few seconds later and was completed successfully.This clamp was followed by a firing failure, failing at ~30% completion.Master supervisory controller (msc) logs show error code 22030 for this failure, with parameters indicating the firing torque was too high.There were no other errors in the msc logs for this stapler 30 instrument.This complaint is considered a reportable event due to the following conclusion: it was alleged that stapler 30 instrument had failed during firing and likely the staple line might be incomplete since missing and malformed staples were confirmed.According to the information obtained, some of the staples were retrieved using another instrument but not all.The root cause of the reported issue cannot be identified as the products have not been returned for failure analysis testing.
|
|
An intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) clinical sales representative (csr) called after the procedure to report that during a da vinci-assisted thoracic pulmonary segmentectomy surgical procedure, the stapler 30 instrument had failed during firing.The isi technical support engineer (tse) reviewed the system logs and confirmed firing failure from stapler 30.The procedure was completed with no reported injury.Isi performed follow-ups and obtained the following additional information: there was no surgical delay reported.The instrument came from the sterile processing department (spd) and nothing was out of the ordinary.There were stapling across fissure and the stapler misfired on the first use.The error message was that the instrument was unable to complete the fire and the blade may be exposed.The instrument blade was found to be exposed, and the staples were not closed.No buttress material was used.There were no clamping issues.The target tissue was the lung.The surgeon was able to resolve the issue.No images or video recordings available for review.Additional follow up confirmed that there were loose staples that remained in the patient¿s body.No staples were missing from the line; however, there were holes or gaps observed for the unfired portion.It is unknown if there was unexpected bleeding."some" of the open staples were reportedly retrieved with another instrument.
|