• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS B 221 <6> SYSTEM; BLOOD GAS ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS B 221 <6> SYSTEM; BLOOD GAS ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03337154001
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/08/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
There were no issues with other patient samples that were tested on the b 221 analyzer before or after this particular patient sample.The customer cross-checked other patient samples tested on the b 221 analyzer with the laboratory and the results were consistent with one another.The cuvette was replaced and calibration was repeated.The field service engineer (fse) did not identify any instrument issues.The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
The initial reporter questioned a low result for 1 patient tested for the total hemoglobin (thb) parameter on a cobas b 221 6 roche omni s6 system.The initial result from the b 221 analyzer was 53.4 g/l.A new sample was obtained and tested in the laboratory with a result of 73 g/l."later on" the thb result was 80 g/l.The date and time of this result were not provided.It is not clear if this result was from the original sample or a new sample.It is not clear if this result was from the laboratory or the b 221 analyzer.The questionable low result was reported outside of the laboratory.The thb cassette lot number and expiration date were not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation reviewed sample-related data, qc data, calibrations, and fluidics/optical data.Qc results were within specification for the thb parameter.Calibrations were acceptable.The alleged result of 80 g/l was not identified within the data provided.Only the result of 53.4 g/l was observed within the data provided.The patient also had lower than normal results for other parameters that were measured (po2, pco2, k, and ca).The patient had an hct of 22.9%; the b 221 instrument flagged this for checking.The flag that was displayed indicates the hct result was low compared to normal ranges.Blood residuum values were reviewed and there was no indication of any interfering substances or any measurement anomalies.Other fluidics/optical data were reviewed showing no evidence of an instrument issue.From the data available, the investigation did not identify a product problem.The cause of the event could not be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS B 221 <6> SYSTEM
Type of Device
BLOOD GAS ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
amy nelson
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3174767531
MDR Report Key15960081
MDR Text Key307891098
Report Number1823260-2022-03973
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CHL
UDI-Device Identifier04015630018345
UDI-Public04015630018345
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K032311
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/12/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03337154001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-