• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROSOFT-3D-AV; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROSOFT-3D-AV; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/21/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination could not be performed as this information was not available or provided at the time this.The remains of the coil was reported to be available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation, but has not yet been returned.The alleged product issue / event as described could not be confirmed.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature coil detachment as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the 3x8 coil was inserted into the aneurysm through a microcatheter and after about 4 attempts both doctors agreed to change to a smaller 3x6 coil.Upon retracting the 3x8 coil, the coil did not come out.The physician was instructed to stop pulling the coil and to take out the microcatheter and the coil together.The coil was successfully removed.The 3x6 coil was inserted through the microcatheter and into the aneurysm.On their final runs, the physicians noted a distal clot and after several attempts to aspirate with a catheter, a trevo stent retriever, and a solitaire, they could not get it all out.Some of the clot was removed, but it traveled distally, and they opted to stop trying to continue to get more, as they felt it kept pushing the clot further along.It was reported that the patient was in the icu and not doing well post-procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation of the returned coil system found the hypotube kinked, and the implant coils stretched and damaged with deformed loops.The pusher was returned severely stretched at the distal section and broken at the transition area, which is consistent with the alleged product issue.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing retraction forces over specification, as described in the reported event.The microcatheter used in the procedure was not evaluated as a part of this evaluation, so the investigation could not determine if it had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Event Description
Please see h10 for investigation conclusion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROSOFT-3D-AV
Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key15973401
MDR Text Key305415619
Report Number2032493-2022-00548
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/13/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-