| Model Number |
142122-06 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Impaired Healing (2378); Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
11/22/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was treated with one 6.0 x 80mm biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) middle third to distal third in the right leg.An antegrade approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy and pre-dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).The lesion was also post-dilated with pta.The site reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a restenosis of the treated segment (target lesion) was identified.A severe right sfa in-stent restenosis (isr) was treated with laser atherectomy and drug coated balloon (dcb) angioplasty.A right popliteal isr was treated with laser atherectomy and dcb and the right tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) was also treated with laser atherectomy and plain old balloon angioplasty (poba).The restenosis event was reported as not related to the device or procedure but due to a worsening of the patient's pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion related.It was reviewed by veryan on 28-nov-22 and considered possibly related to the device.The device remains implanted and the event is reported as resolved/recovered.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction and the device was not returned for analysis.A review has been performed of the manufacturing certificate of conformance associated with this lot.There were no non-conformances or deviations which could be associated with this event.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effect of restenosis leading to intervention is listed in the biomimics 3d instructions for use and is a known patient effect of peripheral stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labelling of the device.If further information regarding this event becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This mdr supplemental provides an update to section b.5.And also updates the initial reporter address in section e.1.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was treated with one 6.0 x 80mm biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) middle third to distal third in the right leg.An antegrade approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy and pre-dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).The lesion was also post-dilated with pta.The site reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a restenosis of the treated segment (target lesion) was identified.A severe right sfa in-stent restenosis (isr) was treated with laser atherectomy and drug coated balloon (dcb) angioplasty on the sfa proximal third to distal popliteal arterial segment on (b)(6) 2022.It was reported as a target lesion revascularisation (tlr) and target vessel revascularisation (tvr).A right popliteal isr was treated with laser atherectomy and dcb and the right tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) was also treated with laser atherectomy and plain old balloon angioplasty (poba).The restenosis event was reported as not related to the device or procedure but due to a worsening of the patient's pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion related.The device remains implanted and the event outcome is reported as resolved/recovered.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction and the device was not returned for analysis.A review has been performed of the manufacturing certificate of conformance associated with this lot.There were no non-conformance's or deviations which could be associated with this event.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effect of restenosis leading to intervention is listed in the bionomics 3d instructions for use and is a known patient effect of peripheral stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labelling of the device.If further information regarding this event becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was treated with one 6.0 x 80mm biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) middle third to distal third in the right leg.An antegrade approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy and pre-dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).The lesion was also post-dilated with pta.The site reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a restenosis of the treated segment (target lesion) was identified.The patient had a slow healing wound on the leg.A severe right sfa in-stent restenosis (isr) was treated with laser atherectomy and drug coated balloon (dcb) angioplasty on the sfa proximal third to distal popliteal arterial segment on (b)(6) 2022.It was reported as a target lesion revascularisation (tlr) and target vessel revascularisation (tvr).A right popliteal isr was treated with laser atherectomy and dcb and the right tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) was also treated with laser atherectomy and plain old balloon angioplasty (poba).The restenosis event was reported as not related to the device or procedure but due to a worsening of the patient's pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion related.The device remains implanted and the event outcome is reported as resolved/recovered.It was reviewed by veryan on 28-nov-2022 and considered possibly related to the device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction and the device was not returned for analysis.A review has been performed of the manufacturing certificate of conformance associated with this lot.There were no non-conformances or deviations which could be associated with this event.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effect of restenosis leading to intervention is listed in the biomimics 3d instructions for use and is a known patient effect of peripheral stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labelling of the device.If further information regarding this event becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Section b.5.Was updated with additional information received, sections g.6.And h.2.Were updated to reflect the type of report (follow-up 03) and reason and section h.11.Was updated to reflect the changes to sections in this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was treated with one 6.0 x 80mm biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) middle third to distal third in the right leg.A contralateral approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy and pre-dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).The lesion was also post-dilated with pta.The site reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a restenosis of the treated segment (target lesion) was identified.The patient had a slow-healing wound on the leg.A severe right sfa in-stent restenosis (isr) was treated with laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloon (dcb) angioplasty on the sfa middle third to tibial-peroneal trunk (tpt) arterial segment on (b)(6) 2022.It was reported as a target lesion revascularisation (tlr) and target vessel revascularisation (tvr).A right popliteal isr was treated with laser atherectomy and dcb and the right tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) was also treated with laser atherectomy and plain old balloon angioplasty (poba).The restenosis event was reported as not related to the device or procedure but due to a worsening of the patient's pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion-related.The device remains implanted and the event outcome is reported as resolved/recovered.It was reviewed by veryan on 28-nov-22 and considered possibly related to the device.Additional information was reviewed by veryan on 15-apr-24 which included the clinical events committee (cec) adjudication of this event.It was determined that it was not related to the study device due to the previous manipulations of the vessel that were part of the previous tlr to treat the first event.This was the second restenosis of the segment where the study stent was placed.The first restenosis of the study stented segment was reported as mdr 3011632150-2022-00118.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|