• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SMARTLOAD; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SMARTLOAD; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number GCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/07/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Age or date of birth, weight and ethnicity: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Implant date: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was originally reported that the smartload intraocular lens (iol) was broken and it was not implanted.Through follow-up we learned that the iol was implanted and once inside the eye, the surgeon saw that the lens was broken.The iol was cut and removed from the patient's operative eye.Another lens, same model, was implanted without any major difficulties.There was no patient injury reported.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 4 jan, 2023 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the intraocular lens (iol) was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received taped to the handpiece tray.The lens was removed and cleaned revealing that the lens was torn and chipped.No further issues were observed with the lens.The complaint smartload was not received; therefore, no further investigation could be performed.The complaint issue of lens damaged was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMARTLOAD
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15992884
Report Number3012236936-2022-03109
Device Sequence Number17573750
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474620674
UDI-Public(01)05050474620674(17)250929
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySP
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/29/2025
Device Model NumberGCB00
Device Catalogue NumberGCB0000235
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/12/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/18/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/29/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-