Occupation: non-healthcare professional investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2017, and the patient was injured without further explanation.The patient has reportedly expired.Specific details surrounding the patient's expiration are currently unknown, and there is no reported allegation of wrongful death at this time.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.The following fields were updated per additional information received: a2, b1, b2, b5, b6, b7, d6b, h6.The following allegations have been investigated: embedded, complex removal, tilt.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications).The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged filter is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on 20oct2017 via the right common femoral vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Allegations include: tilt and first attempt failure due to embedded filter.Patient reportedly expired 19nov2020; however there is no allegation the device contributed to this outcome.Death certificate was requested but is unavailable.Unsuccessful filter removal attempt on (b)(6) 2018 due to embedded filter.Successful filter removal on (b)(6) 2019.27nov2018, per a report from retrieval report (unsuccessful); "however, the filter sheath keopt [sic] advancing adjacent to the filter hook rather than over the filter, again suggesting that the filter hook may be fully embedded within the vena cavai wall.¿one final attempt was made to snare the filter hook using a loop snare without success.Given the difficulties encountered during the procedure, it was decided to abort the procedure.¿ 12feb2019, per a report from retrieval report (successful): "there is significant posterior tilting of the filter with the head of the filter now within the a lumbar vein"."an endobronchial forceps was then advanced through the sheath and utilized to gently removed scar tissue from around the hook and head of the filter.The hook of the ivc filter was then engaged using the snare, and the sheath was then advanced over the filter.The filter was removed in its entirety from the patient.Repeat venacavogram was performed through the sheath, demonstrating intact ivc with no evidence of extravasation".¿technically successful removal of an ivc filter.¿.
|