• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G11638
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/30/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, at the end of a peripheral procedure, the hub separated from a flexor raabe guiding sheath upon removal of the sheath from the patient.Access was obtained in the left femoral artery to target the right superficial femoral artery.The anatomy was calcified, and resistance was reported upon removal of the device from the patient.The dilator was not in place upon sheath removal; however, another manufacturer's wire was in the sheath at the time of the event.The sheath was manually removed from the patient.The procedure had been completed successfully with the complaint device.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation = lead tech.Device evaluated by mfg = device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, at the end of a peripheral procedure, the hub separated from a flexor raabe guiding sheath upon removal of the sheath from the patient.Access was obtained in the left femoral artery to target the right superficial femoral artery.The anatomy was calcified, and resistance was reported upon removal of the device from the patient.The dilator was not in place upon sheath removal; however, another manufacturer's wire was in the sheath at the time of the event.The sheath was manually removed from the patient.The procedure had been completed successfully with the complaint device.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The used complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The sheath was separated from the hub.No sheath material remained in the hub of the device.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The product ifu warns ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance, and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal¿ reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.¿ the ifu instructs the user ¿remove the sheath.Avoid applying reaction to the hub during removal.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of the flexor sheath, consider reinserting the dilator and removing the sheath and dilator as a unit.¿ the information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that failure to follow instructions contributed to this event.The patient¿s anatomy was calcified, and resistance was encountered; however, the user stated that the dilator was not in place during removal of the sheath.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC.
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key15997715
Report Number1820334-2022-01853
Device Sequence Number5767498
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002116382
UDI-Public(01)00827002116382(17)240910(10)14205359
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/10/2024
Device Model NumberG11638
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-6.0-38-55-RB-RAABE
Device Lot Number14205359
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/12/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/30/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/28/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/16/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/21/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/10/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
ABBOTT PRODUCTS, WIRE GUIDE
Patient SexUnknown
-
-