As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a tran-apical tmvr procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve, the valve was implant too ventricular due to the patient having a 'tricky angle'.Paravalvular leak (pvl) and moderate central leak was noted, so the decision was made to implant a second valve.There was no pvl or central leak and no complications.
|
Correction to h6 based on additional information.The device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.However, the instructions for use/training manuals were reviewed for guidance/instruction involving the esheath and delivery system usage.Based on the review of the ifu/training manuals, no deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaints for malpositioned thv and deployed valve exhibits central regurgitation were unable to be confirmed due to unavailability of relevant procedural imagery or medical records.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.As reported, 'during a trans-apical tmvr valve in valve procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in a pre-existing surgical valve, the valve was implant too ventricular due to the patient having a 'tricky angle'.Paravalvular leak and moderate central leak was noted, so the decision was made to implant a second valve'.Valve malposition requiring intervention is a known potential adverse event associated with the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.Per training manual, 'thv should be deployed around 70/30 to 80/20 (aortic/ventricular).' in this case, the valve was placed too ventricularly, which led to thv malposition during deployment.As such available information suggests that procedural factors (valve positioning) may have contributed to the complaint event.During the manufacturing process, all sapien 3 valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for proper coaptation under physiological backpressure conditions prior to release for distribution.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction contributed to the event.Thv malposition can result in improper leaflet function leading to central regurgitation.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (valve malpositioned) may have contributed to the complaint event.However, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|