|
Please note correction to d4 (lot #).The reported event could be confirmed, since the device was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure mode.The device inspection revealed the following: the nail was completely broken at proximal.The breakage surfaces of the thinned webs of the distal recon lag screw hole, proximally to the oblong hole, showed clear evidences of a fatigue fracture ¿ indicated by lines of rest progressing from lateral towards medial, missing plastic deformation and a residual fracture, in ductile manner, at medial.The superior edge of the same drill hole had become damaged intra-operatively by a drill.Chamfer-like material abrasion progressed into the breakage line where the initial incipient crack was found to be in the anterior web at lateral.Removed material had weakened the material significantly.Dimensional inspection indicates that the device is within the specifications.Furthermore, a hardness test according to rockwell on the returned item indicates the material being in accordance with the values in the material specification.In the case presented a 72 year-old female patient, no data provided, had been treated with above implant on an unknown date for an unknown reason.Allegedly on (b)(6) 2022 the implant was revised due to breakage.Except of an undated x-ray copy no medical records were made available.The fracture pattern of the returned nail fragments clearly identified a fatigue fracture.The incipient crack had started in the distal drill hole for the lag screw at lateral where material had been removed by drill contact.This damage had weakened the material's durability significantly.With 1 undated x-ray, only a medical review was classified not being justified.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Received information revealed it was an unstable case, and it took a long time for the bone fusion.1 undated x-ray in p-p-view showed the broken nail and a trochanteric bone fragment completely broken at the lesser trochanteric region.Summarizing above,, the root cause was classified as user related, contributed by patient's condition.If any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|