• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 998006
Medical Device Problem Code Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 06/20/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient underwent urethral stricture balloon dilatation on (b)(6) 2022.During the operation, a balloon was inserted, and the balloon was dilated after filling with water.After drawing the water out, the ureteroscopic balloon dilation catheter could not be pulled out from the urethra.After the balloon was finally pulled out, a break was found in the balloon.Urethroscopy was performed immediately and it was found that the patient¿s urethra was not dilated and there was still scar stenosis.Then, urethral stricture scar resection was performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event is inconclusive because no sample was returned and further investigation was not conclusive.Though a specific cause cannot be determined, a potential root cause for this event could be, "poor balloon design".The device was used for treatment purposes.It is unknown if the device had met relevant specifications or resulted in the reported event.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "only a physician who has an understanding of the clinical applications, technical principles and associated risks of balloon dilation within the urinary tract should use this device." "warning: do not exceed the recommended rated burst pressure (rbp) for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.Please refer to the device label for the recommended maximum rated burst pressure.Extreme caution should be used when considering dilation of irregular, not-compliant tissue or in the presence of certain calculi." "caution: if resistance is felt when removing either the catheter or the guidewire from the introducer sheath, stop and consider removing them as a single unit to prevent damage to the product.Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient underwent urethral stricture balloon dilatation on (b)(6) 2022.During the operation, a balloon was inserted, and the balloon was dilated after filling with water.After drawing the water out, the ureteroscopic balloon dilation catheter could not be pulled out from the urethra.After the balloon was finally pulled out, a break was found in the balloon.Urethroscopy was performed immediately and it was found that the patient¿s urethra was not dilated and there was still scar stenosis.Then, urethral stricture scar resection was performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Common Device Name
BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
xeeroy rada
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key16014814
Report Number1018233-2022-09714
Device Sequence Number7340631
Product Code EZN
UDI-Device Identifier10801741052801
UDI-Public(01)10801741052801
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K050875
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/15/2023
Device Model Number998006
Device Catalogue Number998006
Device Lot NumberBMFQFM13
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/30/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/27/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/25/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-