H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), sample analysis, and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of safety failure was confirmed and the cause appeared to be manufacturing-related.The product returned for evaluation was one 18ga x 18cm powerglide pro midline catheter assembly.The catheter had been advanced and was not returned for evaluation.Although the safety mechanism carrier appeared to had been advanced with the catheter, the safety mechanism remained near the proximal end of the needle shaft.Initial attempts to advance the safety mechanism were unsuccessful.The safety cannister was not mobile on the needle shaft.Microscopic inspection of the needle shaft revealed clear material that appeared consistent with adhesive on the needle shaft, appearing to bond the safety mechanism to the needle.Mobility was established following breaking of the bond between the safety mechanism and the needle shaft.The safety was then successfully engaged over the needle tip.The adhesive-like material on the needle shaft appeared to prevent initial activation of the safety mechanism during the catheter placement procedure.The material appeared to have been deposited during device manufacture.Photographs have been forwarded to the manufacturing site for further evaluation.
|