• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JJGC S.A. CM DRIVE IMPL TI 3.5X16; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JJGC S.A. CM DRIVE IMPL TI 3.5X16; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number 109.684
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fibrosis (3167); Hyperresponsive to stimuli (4538)
Date of Event 11/14/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could be verified.Our manufacturing q-system assures, that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.  the fracture of a dental implant is a known long-term complication of endosseous dental implants.The manufacturers trend analysis confirms that the reported implant fracture rate associated with its dental implants is low and remains consistent with the experience as documented in the literature.There are different reasons why implants break and this problem has been illuminated by various authors (e.G.Maeglin 1988, beumer 1989, tetsch 1991, worthington 1992).Beumer and lewis 1989 report the following causes: a) production / design flaws b) inadequate fitting of the suprastructure c) occlusal overload d) bruxism e) bone resorption around the implants f) insufficient axle alignment of the implants g) trauma h) biomechanical causes i) design of the suprastructure.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2016 in ada 4.Details of surgery: implant surface not completely covered with bone and ridge augmentation.On (b)(6) 2022, fracture of the implant was verified.Patient presented with bone type iii and poor oral hygiene.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer.At the event the patient experienced: mobility and increased sensitivity.No further patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CM DRIVE IMPL TI 3.5X16
Common Device Name
ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
JJGC S.A.
av. juscelino kubitschek de
oliveira, 3291 cic
curitiba PR 81270 -200
BR  81270-200
Manufacturer (Section G)
JJGC S.A.
av. juscelino kubitschek de
oliveira, 3291 cic
curitiba PR 81270 -200
BR   81270-200
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer jackson
60 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
9787472509
MDR Report Key16079225
Report Number3008261720-2022-020330
Device Sequence Number12327876
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier07898237569222
UDI-Public07898237569222
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K123022
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/27/2020
Device Model Number109.684
Device Catalogue Number109.684
Device Lot Number800172590I
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/06/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/30/2022
Event Location Other
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-