|
|
| Model Number |
231804 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the healthcare professional in china that during an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the threads on the 5mm x 30mm milagro screw were peeled.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was discarded by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the proximal part where the channel surface is located appears to be slightly stripped.The complaint reported was confirmed.The photo does not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Physical evaluation should provide more information to discern a possible root cause.The root cause for the issue experienced by the customer cannot be determined.The possible root cause for the stripped can be attribute when the screwdriver was not seated properly in the screw head and while attempting the insertion caused the screw treads and or screw head to become stripped / unable to advance.As per ifu, failure to insert the screw along the tunnel axis may result in device damage.Guidewire use is recommended.Insert the interference screw and driver over the guidewire and fully insert the screw into bone.It is mandatory to completely seat the milagro interference screw onto the correct driver for proper implant delivery.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 8l67287, and no nonconformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Upon visual inspection, the proximal part was slightly stripped.The complaint reported was confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number and no non conformances were identified.The root cause for the issue experienced by the customer cannot be determined.The possible root cause for the stripped can be attribute when the screwdriver was not seated properly in the screw head and while attempting the insertion caused the screw treads and or screw head to become stripped / unable to advance.As per the instructions for use, failure to insert the screw along the tunnel axis may result in device damage.Guidewire use is recommended.Insert the interference screw and driver over the guidewire and fully insert the screw into bone.It is mandatory to completely seat the milagro interference screw onto the correct driver for proper implant delivery.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|