|
|
| Catalog Number |
2025002 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Fistula (1862); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
01/27/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This legal event is being reported as serious injury due to the reported recurrence with surgical intervention.The lot associated with this event was not reported and remains unknown; therefore an internal investigation into the device history records could not be performed.No strattice devices were returned for evaluation.Based on the limited information, including no identification of the lot number, and without relevant patient factors, a relationship between the event and the strattice could not be determined.Due to the legal process, if additional information is made available during legal proceedings, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through a legal event that a 55 year old female patient had hernia repair surgery on or about (b)(6) 2014.During the hernia repair surgery, the surgeon implanted a strattice mesh.After surgery, the patient had revision surgeries on (b)(6) 2017, and (b)(6) 2017.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is follow up#1 to report on 06/apr/2023, pmqa received notification from legal that the lots associated with (b)(4) were found through discovery and are "(b)(6) 2014 implant) and ((b)(6) 2015 implant)".Since the original legal summons did not include information that a second device was implanted, pmqa followed up with legal to verify.As per legal on 14/apr/2023, "based on our records, we just know the plaintiff received one mesh on (b)(6) 2014 and a second mesh (b)(6) 2015.Plaintiff is alleging revision/explant surgeries on (b)(6) 2017 (see below).7/15/2014, ct-guided percutaneous abscess drainage with catheter placement.7/16/14: exploratory laparotomy, abdominal washout, right colectomy, ventral hernia repair; 2/2/2015 l exploratory laparotomy, extensive lysis of adhesions, takedown of a colo cutanerous fistula with resection of an ileocolonic anastomosis and small bowel resection, abdominal wall reconstruction with strattice mesh, component separate and injection of exparel; 12/2/2015: abscess drainage: 12/2/2016l abscess drainage: 1/27/2017 ab wall wound exploration and washout with 19-french blade placement: 2/1/2017: laparoscopic extensive lysis of adhesions, explant of infection biologic mesh, reduction if ventral hernia, ab wall washout, placement of 19-french blake drain." this record is associated with device lot s11253-203 implanted on (b)(6) 2014.Based on the events reported after the implant date, this record is associated with the events reporting on 7/15/2014, ct-guided percutaneous abscess drainage with catheter placement and 7/16/14: exploratory laparotomy, abdominal washout, right colectomy, ventral hernia repair.This is the same event and the same patient reported under mdr # 1000306051-2023-00104 (abbvie complaint # (b)(4).As reported in the initial: it was reported through a legal event that a 55 year old female patient had hernia repair surgery on or about (b)(6) 2014.During the hernia repair surgery, the surgeon implanted a strattice mesh.After surgery, the patient had revision surgeries on (b)(6) 2017.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal investigation into strattice lot s11253 included a review of the reported information, review of the device history records, and a review of the complaint history records.The investigation resulted in no remarkable findings, including no other confirmed complaints reported against the lot and no deviations or related non-conformances revealed during processing.The lot was terminally sterilized within the process parameters and met all qc release criteria.As 17 april 2023, of the (b)(4) devices released to finished goods for lot s11253, (b)(4) have bee distributed with (b)(6) reported as implanted.Based on our internal investigation with no remarkable findings, and without relevant patient factors, a relationship between the strattice and this event could not be determined.Due to the legal process, if additional information is made available during legal proceedings, a supplemental report will be submitted.As reported in the initial: this legal event is being reported as serious injury due to the reported recurrence with surgical intervention.The lot associated with this event was not reported and remains unknown; therefore an internal investigation into the device history records could not be performed.No strattice devices were returned for evaluation.Based on the limited information, including no identification of the lot number, and without relevant patient factors, a relationship between the event and the strattice could not be determined.Due to the legal process, if additional information is made available during legal proceedings, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|