|
|
| Model Number |
8888345629 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Component (2292); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/10/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during the actual insertion of a triple lumen hemodialysis catheter, when the catheter was being thread through the guidewire as per seldinger technique for insertion, the guidewire which was supposed to exit out of the 3rd lumen (i.E.The infusion port), came out of the blue dialysis port.There was no leak, and no luer adapter issue.The procedures noticed that it was a different model than the usual catheter.Flushing was done prior to use and there was no issues prior to insertion and immediately post insertion while checking for patency.The cleaning agent used on the reported product as per hospital protocol was hexanol skin disinfectant prior to insertion and on also at the insertion site during dressing change.The insertion site was cleaned as per hospital protocols for aseptic technique prior to product placement, tego was utilized, there were no other product utilized with the reported product and excessive force was not used on the product.The catheter was not repaired.The guide wire was removed by hand.It was not necessary to remove the guide wire and catheter from the patient simultaneously (in one action) due to the alleged defect and the guidewire was still intact when it was removed.It was stated that as a remedial action reinsertion was done.It was also stated that the rest of the unopened 20cm 12fr catheters were removed by ward 45 micu ncs from ward 45 micu to avoid use.It was also highlighted to the medical officers who are the procedures and the supervisors of the procedures to avoid using the catheter.The procedure was completed, and the dialysis was done for 2 hours with no issues.It was stated that due to the event there were time and cost incurred for nurses and doctors to troubleshoot the line, reprime the circuit, and there was a procedural risk for reinsertions.It was stated that some blood loss was expected during reinsertion and troubleshooting.Blood transfusion was no requ ired.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, g3, h6 new information has been received, and reassessment of the complaint found that it is no longer a reportable issue.The event is no longer associated with a serious injury or potential for serious injury with reoccurrence.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during the actual insertion of a triple lumen hemodialysis catheter, when the catheter was being thread through the guidewire as per seldinger technique for insertion, the guidewire which was supposed to exit out of the 3rd lumen (i.E.The infusion port), came out of the blue dialysis port.There was no leak, and no luer adapter issue.The procedurists noticed that it was a different model than the usual catheter.Flushing was done prior to use and there were no issues prior to insertion and immediately post insertion while checking for patency.The cleaning agent used on the reported product as per hospital protocol was hexanol skin disinfectant prior to insertion and on also at the insertion site during dressing change.The insertion site was cleaned as per hospital protocols for aseptic technique prior to product placement, tego was utilized, there were no other product utilized with the reported product and excessive force was not used on the product.The catheter was not repaired.The guide wire was removed by hand.It was not necessary to remove the guide wire and catheter from the patient simultaneously (in one action) due to the alleged defect and the guidewire was still intact when it was removed.It was stated that as a remedial action reinsertion was done.It was also stated that the rest of the unopened 20cm 12fr catheters were removed by ward 45 micu ncs from ward 45 micu to avoid use.It was also highlighted to the medical officers who are the procedurists and the supervisors of the procedures to avoid using the catheter.The procedure was completed, and the dialysis was done for 2 hours with no issues.It was stated that the incident filed were not product complaints, but rather a practice change.The hospital recently switched from elite to legacy models.Due to the event, there were time and cost incurred for nurses and doctors to troubleshoot the line, reprime the circuit, and there was a procedural risk for reinsertions.It was stated that some blood loss was expected during reinsertion and troubleshooting.Blood transfusion was not required.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|