MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number ENVPRO-16 |
Device Problems
Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/29/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical products: product id: evolutpro-26, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 11-feb-2023, udi#: (b)(4).Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned.¿ these words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve via the left subclavian access route, the valve was implanted.Unfortunately, due to the degree of the native valve calcification, the valve was not fully and well expanded following the release.When withdrawing the delivery catheter system (dcs), the nosecone interacted with the valve frame, dislodging the valve.The valve was withdrawn into the aortic arch using a 25 gooseneck snare.A second transcatheter valve was implanted.It was reported that the valve had been loaded correctly.A 20 fr external introducer sheath was also selected for the procedure.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated b5.Additional information was received that the valve was implanted into the native annulus.No pre implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed.The cuspal overlap technique was used and the training guidance for slow deployment of the valve was followed.Prior to slowly withdrawing the delivery catheter system (dcs), the nose cone was centered within the frame inflow by slightly retracting the guidewire.It was noted that the dcs was not twisted or torqued at any point during deployment.Per the physician, the cause of the dislodgement was the nose cone because the valve was "very angled".Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed on the valve and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The reported event indicates that, after the valve was implanted, the tip of the delivery catheter system (dcs) caught on the valve during removal causing it to dislodge.Dislodgement of the valve by the distal tip is related to operator technique or experience; the evolutr instructions for use, instructs ¿under fluoroscopic guidance, confirm that the catheter tip is coaxial with the inflow portion of the bioprosthesis¿ prior to drawing the dcs tip through the valve.Per the physician, the cause of the dislodgement was the nose cone because the valve was "very angled".As no images were provided for review, this could not be confirmed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|