• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPOD6
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Fold (1255); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/07/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pull wire was within the pusher assembly distal tip.If the pod coil is retracted against resistance, the pusher assembly may elongate beyond the reach of the pull wire and allow the embolization coil to detach from the pusher assembly.The resistance was likely due to the tortuous patient¿s anatomy as mentioned in the complaint.Further evaluation of the device revealed kinks on the pusher assembly and offset coil winds on the embolization coil.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint and likely occurred during packaging for the device return.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal iliac artery (iia) using pod coils, a non-penumbra microcatheter, and an angiographic catheter.It should be noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous and calcified.During the procedure, resistance was encountered while advancing the first pod coil in the middle of the microcatheter; however, the physician continued to advance the pod coil against resistance.After the pod coil was advanced into the target location, it was reported that the pod coil did not take its intended shape.While removing the pod coil, resistance was encountered and, subsequently, the pod coil unintentionally detached inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the microcatheter containing the detached pod coil was removed.The procedure was completed using a new microcatheter to implant a total of thirteen ruby coils and pod coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16090493
Report Number3005168196-2022-00615
Device Sequence Number15136973
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019611
UDI-Public814548019611
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K173614
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/03/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD6
Device Lot NumberF00002107
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/08/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/15/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-