|
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6) 2007, the patient experienced an infection.This adverse event was solved by a revision surgery on
(b)(6) 2022, in which a gii ps hi flex isrt sz 3-4 11 was replaced with a legion insert.Current health status of patient is unknown.
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, the patient had a revision surgery approximately 15 years post total knee arthroplasty due to an infection.The gii ps hi flex isrt sz 3-4 11 was removed and a legion insert was implanted.Per case details, the surgeon thinks it is not the product failure.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It has been communicated via e-mail that no further information is available.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that acute post-surgical wound infection and active, local infection or previous intra-articular infections have been identified as possible adverse effects and contraindications for total knee replacement.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.Additionally, since the device batch number was not provided, a review of the sterilization records could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.With the results of this investigation the root cause of this event could not be determined.A factor that could contribute to the reported event include patient reaction.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|