• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS CARDIOBLATE; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS CARDIOBLATE; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING Back to Search Results
Model Number 49341
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Arrhythmia (1721)
Date of Event 11/29/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient had a concomitant surgical procedure of aortic valve replacement through sternotomy on the (b)(6) 2022.On the day of the procedure a cryoflex probe powered by a cryoconsole, and a cardioblate lp clamp powered by an ft-10 generator were used.The left atrial appendage was successfully stapled.Left pulmonary vein (lpv) block and right pulmonary vein (rpv) conduction block were achieved.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced junctional rhythm.Patient had a normal sinus rhythm (nsr) when they left the operating room and was found to have junctional rhythm the next time their electrocardiogram (ecg) was taken.The patient was treated with percutaneous intervention and they required a transvenous pacing wire.The patient status was recovered/resolved on (b)(6) 2022.The adverse event was deemed by the site as possibly related to the concomitant procedure, the study procedure and the cryoflex probe and cardioblate lp clamp study devices.The adverse event is not related to the cryoconsole study device.The following rationale was provided by the site for relating the adverse event to the concomitant and study procedures, ablation/ conduction delay.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient had a concomitant surgical procedure of aortic valve replacement through sternotomy on the (b)(6) 2022.On the day of the procedure a cryoflex probe powered by a cryoconsole, and a cardioblate lp clamp powered by an ft-10 generator were used.The left atrial appendage was successfully stapled.Left pulmonary vein (lpv) block and right pulmonary vein (rpv) conduction block were achieved.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced junctional rhythm.Patient had a normal sinus rhythm (nsr) when they left the operating room and was found to have junctional rhythm the next time their electrocardiogram (ecg) was taken.The patient was treated with percutaneous intervention and they required a transvenous pacing wire.The patient status was recovered/resolved on (b)(6) 2022.The adverse event was deemed by the site as possibly related to the concomitant procedure, the study procedure and the cryoflex probe and cardioblate lp clamp study devices.The adverse event is not related to the cryoconsole study device.The following rationale was provided by the site for relating the adverse event to the concomitant and study procedures, ablation/ conduction delay.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic received additional information that the adverse event was also possibly related to the cyroconsole study device.Correction b3: date of event updated.Correction b5: medtronic received additional information that the patient experienced junctional rhythm on 29 nov 2022.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARDIOBLATE
Common Device Name
SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16093614
Report Number2184009-2023-00004
Device Sequence Number6559011
Product Code OCL
UDI-Device Identifier00643169998018
UDI-Public00643169998018
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K182610
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Study,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/24/2025
Device Model Number49341
Device Catalogue Number49341
Device Lot Number664F
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/08/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/23/2023
03/30/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/04/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/23/2023
04/28/2023
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight79 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-