• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBC REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBC REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number 6801428
Medical Device Problem Codes False Negative Result (1225); False Positive Result (1227)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/03/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that discordant, non-reactive vitros anti-hbc (ahbc) results and discordant, positive vitros anti-hbs (ahbs) samples from one patient were tested using vitros ahbc lot 2680 and vitros ahbs lot 3990 on a vitros 5600 immunodiagnostic system.The vitros results were considered discordant when compared to results from a non-vitros (abbott) method.The assignable cause of the discordant, vitros ahbc and vitros ahbs results for the patient is the presence of a sample interferent present in the patient samples that were tested.The discordant vitros ahbc and vitros ahbs results were not reported from the laboratory.Ortho has not been made aware of any allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.
 
Event or Problem Description
A customer contacted the ortho clinical diagnostics (ortho) technical solution center (tsc) to report discordant, non-reactive vitros anti-hbc (ahbc) results and discordant, positive vitros anti-hbs (ahbs) samples from one patient were tested using vitros ahbc lot 2680 and vitros ahbs lot 3990 on a vitros 5600 immunodiagnostic system.The vitros results were considered discordant when compared to results from a non-vitros (abbott) method.Patient 1, vitros ahbs results of 40.76 and 48.27 miu/l (positive) versus the expected result of negative patient 1, vitros ahbc result of 1.98 and 1.87 s/c (non-reactive) versus the expected result of reactive the discordant vitros ahbc and vitros ahbs results were not reported from the laboratory.Ortho has not been made aware of any allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report is number two of two mdr¿s for this event.Two 3500a forms are being submitted for this event as two devices were involved.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc (ortho) complaint number (b)(4) and reportability assessment (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS ANTI-HBC REAGENT PACK
Common Device Name
IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
laurie o'riordan
microtyping systems
1295 southwest 29th avenue
pompano beach, FL 33069
9549709500
MDR Report Key16097139
Report Number3007111389-2023-00003
Device Sequence Number12423334
Product Code LOM
UDI-Device Identifier10758750001217
UDI-Public10758750001217
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/13/2023
Device Model Number6801428
Device Catalogue Number6801428
Device Lot Number2680
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/09/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-