| Model Number |
1320-0125 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
12/09/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "there were three gamma nail surgeries that day, and the product in question was used in the first of them.When the product was being prepared for use in the third surgery, a chip was found on the tip.It was not used in the second surgery.The circumstances of the break are unknown; it is possible that it occurred during the first surgery and a fragment is left in the body of the patient, and it may have occurred during the cleaning process after the first surgery.".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "there were three gamma nail surgeries that day, and the product in question was used in the first of them.When the product was being prepared for use in the third surgery, a chip was found on the tip.It was not used in the second surgery.The circumstances of the break are unknown; it is possible that it occurred during the first surgery and a fragment is left in the body of the patient, and it may have occurred during the cleaning process after the first surgery.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Please also note the corrections to h6 method, h6 results and h6 conclusion codes.The reported event could be confirmed.The device inspection revealed the following: the identification of the returned instrument was confirmed based on the catalog # and the lot # marked.As reported, the tip is broken, the size of the fragment is significant.Such breakage could only have been produced by careless handling of the device.However, based on the analysis of the instrument and the information provided, it was not possible to identify the exact reason of the breakage.It could be a result of excessive force applied during the operation (such as leverage or unintended impaction) or after falling on the floor.The breakage could also have occurred during careless transportation or sterilization, where the instrument could have broken due to impaction with other devices.During manufacturing, functionality test and dimensional inspection were done according to specifications.During the inspection, all devices met the specifications.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to an user related issue.The failure was caused by careless handling of the device, during operation or transportation/sterilization.As a reminder, the instructions for use clearly state that: "¿ during the procedure, repeatedly check that the connections between the instruments or between implants and instruments required for the precise positioning and fixing are secure.¿ do not hit instruments unless they are specifically intended for impaction.Never hit targeting devices or elastosil handles other than those with an integrated strike plate!" a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|