|
It was reported that after the implantation of a ct lucia 602 lens, the lens was explanted, he thought that something looked funny about the haptics after the iol was injected into the anterior chamber.He attributed this to the technician who loaded the lens not having done so for a while.A johnson and johnson emerald injector with the unfolder emerald xl delivery system was used.Another ct lucia 602 lens was implanted with no issues.No patient injury reported or clinically significant delay in procedure reported no additional information provided.
|
|
The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and met all criteria for release.The device has not been sent back.Thus, a proper device analysis could not be completed nor the reported issues confirmed.The customers stated that there was no damage noted during preparation for use indicating a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported issues.It was stated by the customer they are using a j&j injector to implant lenses, our lenses are intended to be implanted using a z28 cartridge and r28 injector.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia product and based on our experience and other complaints that have already been resolved we have determined that the following factors may have cause or contributed to the damaged haptic is but is not limited to: loading strategy; lens placement technique; accessory device support; poor handling during folding and inserting.
|