• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. PHASIX MESH; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. PHASIX MESH; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1191020
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Sepsis (2067); Bowel Perforation (2668); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 02/15/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this is an addendum to the initial emdr submitted (mdr number 1213643-2023-090061).This supplemental emdr is being submitted to report the additional information provided regarding the implanted device.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum: it was reported that the patient had multiple issues and surgeries since implant of bard flat mesh back in 2019.It was reported in jan-2020 "patient begin to get bloated' then become septic in feb-2020.It was also reported that the mesh had gotten into the intestine, deteriorated and had huge scar on the stomach after another surgery.It was reported that the patient had been taking pain killers.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum as per additional information provided: as reported, patient had multiple issues and surgeries after the implant of phasix mesh in late 2019.After two days, patient became sick and developed infection.Patient began to get bloated and was told by doctors that mesh was fine on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020, patient became septic, the mesh had gotten into intestines and deteriorated part of the intestines and now had a huge scar on stomach after another surgery.It was reported that the patient quality of life diminished and almost got addicted to pain killers due to the amount of pain.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum #1: this supplemental emdr is being submitted to report the additional information provided regarding the implanted device.Addendum #2: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to correct the event and product information that was incorrectly documented in previous supplemental emdr.Based on the information provided, no conclusions can be made as to what if any extent the phasix mesh caused or contributed to the patient¿s post operative condition.The instructions-for-use (ifu) supplied with the device identifies infection, pain in the adverse reactions section as a possible post-op complications.In regards to infection the warnings section of the ifu states "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.Consideration should be given regarding the need to remove the mesh.An unresolved infection may require the removal of the mesh." no lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Note, the date of event is considered to be a best estimate as 15-feb-2020 based on the information available.Updated fields: b3 (date of event).Corrected fields: d1 (brand name), d.2 b, d4 (catalog no.& udi no.), g4 (pma/510(k) #).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHASIX MESH
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC.
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key16120153
Report Number1213643-2023-090061
Device Sequence Number15316932
Product Code OOD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741107573
UDI-Public(01)00801741107573
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161424
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/23/2024
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1191020
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/01/2024
07/17/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/09/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/17/2024
07/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-