| Model Number |
1219-36-158 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Fall (1848); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
12/20/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision of corail pinnacle thr due to peri-prosthetic fracture.Vancouver b2 type fracture.Stem was removed and zimmer distal fixing stem inserted.Due to age of liner it was also changed for new altrx one.Head and liner showed minimal wear and nil further issues.Doi: unknown.Dor: (b)(6) 2022.Unknown side.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received.A.What is the affected side involved in this event? -the affected side of the patient was the left hip.B.What caused the periprosthetic fracture? did the patient have a fall? -a fall was the reason for the fracture.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: the device associated with this report was not returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Review of the photographic evidence cannot confirmed the reported allegation.Due to the poor quality of the evidence provided, no signs of wear or deterioration were observed on the device.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.H10 additional narrative: added: b5, d10 (concomitant) corrected: h6 (health effect - clinical code).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|