| Model Number |
1012276-20 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/27/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a stent thrombosis in the mid right coronary artery (rca) without calcification and without tortuosity.The 3.5x20mm nc trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) had no resistance during advancement and was used to dilate the thrombus.However, the trek balloon got caught on the tip of the guide catheter during removal and it was then decided to simply withdraw all devices altogether.Nothing remained in the patient.The procedure was re-started and rewired and completed.Hours later the same day, the patient died.Per the physician the trek balloon did not cause or contribute to the patient's death in any way and the stent thrombosis was the cause of death.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a stent thrombosis in the mid right coronary artery (rca) without calcification and without tortuosity.The 3.5x20mm nc trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) had no resistance during advancement and was used to dilate the thrombus.However, the trek balloon got caught on the tip of the guide catheter during removal and it was then decided to simply withdraw all devices altogether.Nothing remained in the patient.The procedure was re-started and rewired and completed.Hours later the same day, the patient died.Per the physician the trek balloon did not cause or contribute to the patient's death in any way and the stent thrombosis was the cause of death.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed report, the additional information was provided: it was confirmed by the account that slight force was applied and the balloon separated from the catheter but was simply withdrawn with all the devices.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 - medical device problem code 2017 - excessive force.Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty removing the device and balloon separation could not be replicated/confirmed in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.Although, the reported balloon separation could not be confirmed during return analysis, it is likely that the noted outer and inner member distal to the guide wire exit notch is what the account perceived as the reported separation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.It was reported that slight force was applied, and the balloon separated from the catheter and was simply withdrawn with all the devices.It should be noted that the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), trek rx and mini trek rx, global, instructions for use (ifu) states: if resistance is felt, determine the cause before proceeding.Continuing to advance or retract the catheter while under resistance may result in damage to the vessels and / or damage / separation of the catheter.In this case, it is likely that the violation of the ifu contributed to the reported separation as the device separated after force was applied.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulty removing the device; however, the reported separation appears to be related to user error/operational context.It was reported by the account that per the physician the trek balloon did not cause or contribute to the patient's death in any way.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|