• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number 220220903
Medical Device Problem Code Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Cyst(s) (1800); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Implant Pain (4561)
Date of Event 12/22/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.Device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a total ankle replacement.The patient presented with pain.Upon ct scan, it was noted that the talar component appears to have subsided.The patient may need to undergo a revision surgery for the talar component and poly extraction.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed, since review of the available information and provided ct imaging does confirm the talar component has subsided and the talar neck has fractured which most likely will require a revision surgery.Medical affairs was consulted on the details of this case.According to their review of the available information and the provided ct imaging, "the tibial components are all in the right position, no signs of loosening.The talar component has subsided anteriorly and cysts formation around the talar stem and anteriorly in the talus are visible.There is a fracture of the talar neck".Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient-factors related issue.The subsidence of the talar component was most likely caused by the presence of cysts in the talus as well as the fracture of the talar identified in the talar neck.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a total ankle replacement.The patient presented with pain.Upon ct scan, it was noted that the talar component appears to have subsided.The patient may need to undergo a revision surgery for the talar component and poly extraction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16188753
Report Number3010667733-2023-00021
Device Sequence Number12400284
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420124227
UDI-Public00840420124227
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K100886
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number220220903
Device Catalogue Number220220903
Device Lot Number1647858
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/22/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/23/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/17/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/23/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-