• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0630
Medical Device Problem Codes Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/16/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Evaluation also revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured, and the pet lock was separated.The pull wire was not retracted sufficiently to detach the embolization coil; therefore, the pusher fracture likely caused the unintentional detachment.If the pusher assembly fractures, the pull wire will likely become retracted, and the embolization coil will detach.The pusher assembly fracture likely occurred during removal from the microcatheter after encountering resistance.Further evaluation revealed pusher assembly kinks and offset coil winds on the embolization coil.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint and likely occurred during packaging for the device return.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using ruby coils and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).It should be noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician encountered resistance while advancing the first ruby coil in the middle of the lantern.While retracting the ruby coil, it unintentionally detached inside the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the detached ruby coil was removed from the patient and the ruby coil was flushed out from the lantern on the back table.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil of the same size, five additional ruby coils, and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16189775
Report Number3005168196-2023-00031
Device Sequence Number11805637
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018362
UDI-Public814548018362
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K173614
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/17/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0630
Device Lot NumberF00000537
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/29/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/22/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-