• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. PRECICE SYSTEM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. PRECICE SYSTEM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number P8.5-80X275
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and is pending evaluation.The root cause is unable to be determined at this time.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Information was received that the nail malfunctioned.No further information has been provided.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information has been provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: visual inspection of the returned nail revealed the housing tube had cracks at the anti-rotation lug in the crown region and the anti-rotation lug was broken in four pieces which confirmed the reported failure.X-ray images of the internal components confirmed the broken anti-rotation lug.The work order was reviewed and confirmed the device passed all inspections per the acceptance tests.A review of the manufacturing x-ray image showed the anti-rotation lug (crown) was seated properly in the housing body.The inspection data for the lots of anti-rotation lug and housing tube were reviewed and confirmed the parts met design specifications per the engineering drawings.Based on limited information provided and no specific details provided with regard to a cause that may have caused the failure, the exact cause for the confirmed failure mode cannot be determined.However, based on the type of breakage observed, it is possible the nail broke due to stress generated from weight bearing activities.Device records review: a review of the device history records (dhr) confirmed the device met all quality inspections and specifications prior to release.Device labeling: per the precise instructions for use "the precise intramedullary limb lengthening nail cannot withstand the stresses of full weight bearing for tibia and femur applications.For humerus applications, patients should not bear any weight on the treated limb.Patients should utilize external support and/or restrict activities until consolidation occurs.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECICE SYSTEM
Common Device Name
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer (Section G)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo, CA 92656
8583448112
MDR Report Key16196497
Report Number3006179046-2023-00104
Device Sequence Number4385935
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device Identifier00887517935793
UDI-Public887517935793
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K191336
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberP8.5-80X275
Device Lot Number2051611AAA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/30/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/27/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/23/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/18/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexPrefer Not To Disclose
-
-