• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST MESH; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST MESH; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKAA078
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Necrosis (1971); Seroma (2069); Hernia (2240)
Event Date 03/01/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, no conclusions can be made.The information obtained is limited to the journal article.Postoperative seroma, hernia recurrence and infection are known inherent risks of surgery/use of the device and are included as possible complications in the adverse reactions section of the instructions-for-use (ifu), supplied with the device.Regarding infection, the warnings section of the ifu states: "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.Consideration should be given regarding the need to remove the mesh.An unresolved infection may require removal of the device." no lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Note, the date of event (01-mar-2014) is provided as an estimate based on the information provided.This mdr represents the ventralight st mesh.An additional mdr was submitted to represent the soft mesh.Not returned.
 
Event Description
Per journal article: "preventing recurrence in clean and contaminated hernias using biologic versus synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair" (ann surg 2021; 273:648¿655).The aim of this study: to evaluate which mesh type (synthetic vs.Biological mesh) yields lower recurrence and complication rates after ventral hernia repair.Conclusion: the risk of hernia recurrence was significantly higher for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with biologic mesh compared to synthetic mesh, with similar rates of postoperative complications.These data indicate that the use of synthetic mesh over biologic mesh to repair ventral hernias is effective and can be endorsed, including under contaminated wound conditions.Clinical trial conducted from march 2014 through october 2018.165 patients enrolled with an average follow up of 26 months.Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio).All hernia repair procedures were performed using either a biologic (porcine strattice mesh) or synthetic (polypropylene ventralight st or soft mesh) mesh.As reported, between march 2014 to oct 2018, a total of 165 patients in which 83 patients underwent ventral hernia repair using synthetic mesh and 82 patients underwent hernia repair using biologic mesh.14 patients (21.9%) assigned to synthetic mesh reported hernia recurrence.Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications included, mesh infection, seroma, wound necrosis and (5) mesh explants.Article does not provide case/product specific information to know which patient were implanted with what device and experienced what complications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRALIGHT ST MESH
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key16239973
MDR Text Key308078902
Report Number1213643-2023-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K101851
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKAA078
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-