| Model Number |
96-2011 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had her left knee replaced in (b)(6).The exact date is unknown nor was there an operative report available.She came because of stability and pain issues in her left knee.X-rays incited that the construct was a depuy sigma cr rp total knee construct.The surgeon revised her left knee and found that the polyethylene rp insert was worn out posterior lateral which may have resulted in an unbalanced knee.A size 2 left cr sigma femur and a sz 2 x 10 cvd rp insert was explanted.A new sz 2 ps femur with a stem extension was implanted with a sz 2 x 10mm ps insert.The lot number information was unable to be recorded because of bone cement in the back side of femur.Doi: unknown.Dor: (b)(6) 2023.Affected side: left knee.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|