• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX23A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problems Hemolysis (1886); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/04/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Thv/tvt registry.The investigation is ongoing.The valve remains implanted.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist, approximately 14 days post tavr procedure with a 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve in the aortic position, the patient presented with severe paravalvular leak (pvl) so the cardiologist decided to balloon with a 24 true balloon.After ballooning the patient had severe central leak.A valve in valve was performed a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve in the aortic position.The 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve helped with central leak and a little with the pvl.Per the fcs the perceived root cause of the pvl was undersized valve choice.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for additional information from a product investigation.The following section of this report has been updated:.The device was not returned for evaluation.As the device was not returned, visual inspection, functional testing, and dimensional testing were unable to be done.The complaints for paravalvular leak and central regurgitation were unable to be confirmed as no imagery/medical record was provided for evaluation.A review of the dhr and lot history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint event.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, an elliptical annulus shape and valve under-sizing.In the case of pvl reported ''perceived root cause of the pvl was undersized valve choice.The patients native annulus area was measuring between sizing 23/26 per echo''.It was likely the undersized valve was selected, which would increase the risk of paravalvular leak over time due to inadequate sealed against to the target site (native annulus).In addition, it was noted that the patient had a bicuspid native valve.This could have posed a challenge to deploy the valve to create a seal against the target site (native annulus) due to the non-circular shape of landing zone and irregular contact between valve and target site also resulting in paravalvular leak.In the case of the central regurgitation, after post-dilation with 24mm true balloon the valve was likely over expanded from the post-dilation with bigger size of non-edwards balloon, which could prevent proper motion of the thv leaflets and lead to central regurgitation.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (biscupid native valve) and/or procedural factors (undersized valve) may have contributed to the paravalvular leak and procedural factors (post-dilation, over expanded valve) may have contributed to the central regurgitation.Since no product non-conformances or ifu or training deficiencies were identified during evaluation, neither a product risk assessment escalation, nor corrective or preventative actions are required.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted based on additional information provided by the field clinical specialist.The following sections of this report have been updated: additional information b.5, g.3, g.6, h.2 and h.6 (updated clinical code to hemolysis).The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
Per the field clinical specialist, the patient's native annulus area was measuring between sizing 23/26 per echo.Prior to the valve-in-valve procedure the patient was hemolyzing the valve.The site was not planning to treat the paravalvular leak and were happy with the end results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16251115
MDR Text Key308229511
Report Number2015691-2023-10386
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201321
UDI-Public(01)00690103201321(17)250526
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750TFX23A
Device Catalogue Number9750TFX23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-