| Model Number |
QN89181400 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to available information, this device required replacement due to a tubing tear.A 1 cm tear along the tubing was noted at the right cylinder at the point where the exit tubing was coming from the tunica.No other adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Titan pump, cylinders 1 and 2, and detached connector / tubing were received for evaluation.Abrasion was noted on both exhaust tubes and the inlet tube of the pump.No functional abnormalities were noted with the pump.Abrasion was noted on the exhaust tubes of cylinder 1 and cylinder 2.A separation, surrounded by abrasion, was noted on exhaust tube of cylinder 1 near the strain relief.This is a site of leakage.No functional abnormalities were noted with cylinder 2.Abrasion was noted on the detached connector tubing.No functional abnormalities were noted with the detached connector tubing.Based on examination of the returned product, it was concluded that while in-vivo both the exhaust tubes and inlet tube of the pump had overlapped and abraded against one another.This positioning, in combination with device usage over time, could contribute to sufficient stress to separate exhaust tube of cylinder 1 near the strain relief.A separation of this type could then allow the loss of fluid, making the device inoperable.A review of the device history record confirmed the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.A review of the complaint history database, nonconformances and capas revealed no trends for this lot.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|