• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5955680
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Seroma (2069)
Date of Event 11/01/2012
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, no conclusions can be made.As reported, patients experienced pain and seroma post implant of ventralight st mesh (w/ echo ps).No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Seroma and pain are known inherent risks of surgery and are identified in the instructions-for-use, supplied with the device as a possible complications.Note, the date of event is provided as an estimate ((b)(6) 2012) based on the information provided.Remains implanted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per journal article: "comparison of two different concepts of mesh and fixation technique in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial": purpose: the aim of this study was to compare two different mesh/fixation system concepts (non-bard/davol physiomesh/secure-strap (ph group) and ventralight st/sorbafix (vs group) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in 50 patients with respect to postoperative complications.Conclusion: the ph system was associated with significantly greater hernia recurrences and postoperative pain compared with the vs system.This confirms the superiority of the elastic (ventralight st) mesh concept, which may be a safer and more efficacious option for laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.This was single-center, prospective, randomized study designed to include 50 patients recruited for each group (ph & vs) from 01-nov-2012 to 31-aug-2013, with a planned interim analysis for safety after 25 patients.After the enrollment of 25 patients in both groups, the trial was terminated due to complications observed in the ph group.Five recurrences were observed in the ph group in the first 6 months and none in the vs group.Pain was noted in 22/ph, 20/vs at 7 days; 20/ph, 5/vs at 1 month; 14/ph, 0/vs at 3 months; 8/ph, 0/vs at 3 months.One seroma was observed in ph group and 2 seroma cases in vs group.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key16261210
Report Number1213643-2023-00029
Device Sequence Number4758176
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031755
UDI-Public(01)00801741031755
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryPL
PMA/510(K) Number
K122436
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Literature
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number5955680
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-