• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602; CT LUCIA 602, PRODUCT CODE: HQL, PRODUCT CODE: HQL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602; CT LUCIA 602, PRODUCT CODE: HQL, PRODUCT CODE: HQL Back to Search Results
Model Number CT LUCIA 602
Medical Device Problem Codes Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 01/06/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and met all criteria for release.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The lens was sent back with one haptic cut and missing.Additionally, it was noted that the haptic appears to have been pulled out of the optic socket.However, we are unable to test the integrity of the poxy and haptic binding, by performing a pull test as the haptic has been cut.It appears the lens was prepped for the yamane technique; this technique induces a larger force amount of force while trying to position the haptics in the scleral tunnel.Our lenses are intended to be implanted in the capsular bag.Thus, the lens was used off-label.Additionally, it was stated there was no damage noted to the device during preparation for use, which suggest a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported issue.Issue is likely linked to handling errors, surgical technique, and off-label use and not a product quality issue.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the lens tilted in the eye.The lens was removed and another lens was implanted.No additional information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CT LUCIA 602
Common Device Name
CT LUCIA 602, PRODUCT CODE: HQL, PRODUCT CODE: HQL
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer Contact
manjaya hedge
5300 central parkway
dublin, CA 94568
9252164697
MDR Report Key16285360
Report Number3010126268-2023-00021
Device Sequence Number4757837
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00843045100904
UDI-Public(01)00843045100904(17)260831
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100016-S008
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2026
Device Model NumberCT LUCIA 602
Device Catalogue Number003500-0050-669
Device Lot Number3S211017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/27/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/08/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-