| Model Number |
1012450-15 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/17/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that upon opening the package of the nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) and the xience skypoint stent delivery system (sds), the devices were noted to be damaged.The shaft of the nc trek was broken and in two separate pieces and the distal tip of the xience skypoint sds was frayed.Another nc trek bdc and xience skypoint sds were used to complete the procedure.There was no patient involvement and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Returned device analysis identified that the nc trek showed signs of use.The account confirmed that the device was attempted to be used but failed to cross the lesion due to the anatomy.The balloon catheter caught on some calcium in the vessel and the physician had to pull on it to get it out and it separated.The device was removed with no harm to the patient.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medical device problem code 2017 - against resistance.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was returned for analysis.Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.The reported failure to advance and difficulty removing the device from the anatomy could not be replicated in a testing environment as they are based on operational circumstances.It should be noted that the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), nc traveler rx, global, instruction for use (ifu) states: if resistance is felt, determine the cause before proceeding.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance, material separation and difficulty removing the device appears to be related to operational context.The reported shaft separation occurred after force was applied during device retrieval, which may have contributed to the separation; however, this cannot be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that upon opening the package of the nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) and the xience skypoint stent delivery system (sds), the devices were noted to be damaged.The shaft of the nc trek was broken and in two separate pieces and the distal tip of the xience skypoint sds was frayed.Another nc trek bdc and xience skypoint sds were used to complete the procedure.There was no patient involvement and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Returned device analysis identified that the nc trek showed signs of use.The account confirmed that the device was attempted to be used but failed to cross the lesion due to the anatomy.The balloon catheter caught on some calcium in the vessel and the physician had to pull on it to get it out and it separated.The device was removed with no harm to the patient.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed report, the following information was provided.The procedure was to treat the circumflex (cx) artery into the left main with heavy calcification and severe tortuosity.The nc trek was removed independently but the physician was aggressive and shaft separated.The xience skypoint sds was attempted to be used and failed to cross due to the anatomy.There was resistance during removal and force was applied.The stent was noted to have flared struts on the proximal end and not frayed.There were no other device issues noted such a separation or stent dislodgment.There was no adverse patient effect.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|