• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Gradient Increase (1270); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problem Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446)
Event Date 01/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.Valve remains implanted.
 
Event Description
As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), approximately 1 year and 3 months post tavr procedure with a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra valve in the aortic position the patient had a valve in valve procedure due to stenosis and regurgitation.Another 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve was successfully implanted.Per the fcs the baseline peak/mean gradient upon deployment was pg: 24/mg: 19 mmhg.The current mean gradient is 1 mmhg.The patient was symptomatic with shortness of breath, volume overload and leg swelling.The ava indexed is 1.2cm2/m2.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for additional information from a product investigation.The device was not returned for evaluation.As the device was not returned, visual inspection, functional testing, and dimensional testing were unable to be done.The complaints for central regurgitation and improper leaflet coaptation were confirmed based on provided medical records.A review of dhr, lot history, and complaint history did not identify any manufacturing non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, no ifu/training manual inadequacies were identified.During the manufacturing process, all sapien s3 ultra valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for proper coaptation under physiological backpressure conditions prior to release for distribution.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect contributed to the event.As reported, ''approximately 1 year and 3 months post tavr procedure with a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra valve in the aortic position the patient had a valve in valve procedure due to stenosis and regurgitation''.Additionally, the ct performed on 01/05/2023 indicated that ''there is mild prolapse of the leaflet in rcc position and abnormal motion (with some restriction and possible disrupted anatomy of the leaflet close to commissure with lcc, not well visualized) of the leaflet in ncc position, which would explain the aortic insufficiency seen by echo''.It was noted that there was mild prolapse of anatomical leaflet at rcc position, which could have interfered the normal blood flow pressure required for proper valve function, leading to abnormal coaptation of the ncc leaflet.As such available information suggests patient factors (leaflet prolapsed) may have contributed to the reported leaflet coaptation.Due to improper leaflet coaptation, the normal functioning of leaflet is impacted resulting in observed central leak.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (improper leaflet coaptation) may have contributed to the central regurgitation.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.There were no ifu/training materials inadequacies or edwards defect identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative actions nor product risk assessment (pra) is required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for additional information based on medical record review.The following sections of this report have been updated: corrected information: h.6 device code(s) (corrected from gradient increase, difficult to open or close and fluid leak to fluid leak).The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
Per medical records review, a tte performed 1 year and 1 month post tavr reported that the s3u valve had trace transvalvular regurgitation, no paravalvular leak and with normal prosthetic gradient.Av mean gradient was 8 mmhg.Approximately 2 and a half months later the patient presented with shortness of breath, suspected pulmonary edema and a new cardiac murmur.A tte performed reported that the s3u valve appeared to be well seated, with a mean gradient of 12 mmhg and peak velocity 2.4 m/s, av area cont vti 3.3 cm2.There was significant valvular aortic regurgitation which is at least moderate to severe and possible severe.A tee was performed to clarify the etiology of the regurgitation, per the report: aortic regurgitation is eccentric and posteriorly directed and appeared to be severe.There appeared to be prolapse of the anatomical right coronary cusp (rcc) which is a possible mechanism for the regurgitation.The noncoronary cusp (ncc) was not well visualized which was ''concerning for complete degeneration/tear, but shadowing may be obscuring the view.No evidence of vegetation or thickening of the visualized leaflets''.A cardiac ct scan done reported: the s3u''valve is well-seated, the valve is well seated, the leaflets are not well visualized but the leaflet thickness is not increased except for mildly increased thickness at the base of the left leaflet.It appears that there is mild prolapse of the leaflet in rcc position and also abnormal motion of the ncc leaflet (with some restriction and possible disrupted anatomy of the leaflet close to commissure with lcc, not well visualized), which would explain the aortic insufficiency seen by echo.'' there is no image of perivalvular leak.Per tte done post valve-in-valve procedure there was no aortic valve regurgitation, mean gradient 5 mmhg, no stenosis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16315843
MDR Text Key309010053
Report Number2015691-2023-10665
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201338
UDI-Public(01)00690103201338(17)230531
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/07/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2023
Device Model Number9750TFX26A
Device Catalogue Number9750TFX26A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-