|
Visual inspection: during the visual inspection a damage of the outer housing of the prosa valve could be determined.The measurement of the plane parallelism could confirm that with a value of -0,141 mm - outside tolerance (0 ± 0.02 mm).Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the prosa is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested both the horizontal as well as the vertical position.Due to the brake function failure the computer- controlled test is not meaningful, as the valve cannot maintain the set opening pressure if the brake is defective.Adjustment test: the prosa valve was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.However, this was possible without any force being applied.The brake function is failed.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function did not operate as expected.The results indicate that the rotor no longer performs as required.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valve, deposits were found in prosa.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine a damage of the outer housing of the valve as well a brake function failure.The determined damage of the outer housing can be named as the cause for the brake function failure.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|