• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26
Device Problem Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The medical article ''valve-in-valve-in-ring: a bailout strategy to tackle paravalvular leaks due to device malapposition'' was reviewed.During the review it was noted that a 55-year-old male underwent a mitral valve-in-ring transfemoral percutaneous procedure with a 26mm edwards sapien 3 ultra valve.After the valve was released, severe paravalvular leak coming from the lateral side was observed, possibly due to the high position of the sealing skirt in the lateral portion of the stented valve.To promptly tackle this issue, a second valve with further post-dilation was successfully implanted, and the paravalvular leak disappeared.At the end of the procedure, no paravalvular leaks were detected and only a mild increase of the mv mean gradient (8 mmhg) with normal estimated pulmonary pressures was present.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: vairo, alessandro, et al.''valve-in-valve-in-ring: a bailout strategy to tackle paravalvular leaks due to device malapposition.'' journal of cardiovascular echography 31.4 (2021): 246.Investigation is ongoing.Valve remains implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected h.6 type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device was not returned for evaluation.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.During manufacturing of the sapien 3 ultra valve, the valve and components are inspected several times throughout the manufacturing process.In addition, product verification testing was performed on a sampling basis and all testing met specifications.These inspections performed during manufacturing process and testing performed during product verification support that it is unlikely that a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the reported events.Imagery from the article was reviewed and a paravalvular jet was present following thv deployment.It should be noted that the sapien 3 ultra thv was deployed within a pre-existing mitral ring via transfemoral procedure with no details provided about the implant date.Per the ifu, s3u valve with the commander delivery system (ds) was only approved for replacement of native aortic valve due to calcific stenosis in the eu region.Therefore, this was off-label operation.The ifu and training manuals for tf (transfemoral) procedure in the aortic position and were reviewed for relevant guidance for an s3u implant using a commander delivery system.The edwards sapien 3 ultra system is indicated for use in patients with heart disease due to native calcific aortic stenosis at any or all levels of surgical risk for open heart surgery.Physicians are warned that correct sizing of the thv is essential to minimize the risk of paravalvular leak, migration, and/or annular rupture.Ensure fluoroscopic view used for deployment is the coplanar view where inferior aspect of all 3 cusps are on same plane.If positioning is difficult using fluoroscopy alone, consider using both fluoroscopy and echo.Ensure to pull back the flex catheter prior to thv deployment.Small paravalvular regurgitant jets are common.They are hemodynamically insignificant and may resolve within minutes to hours.No ifu/training deficiencies were identified.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.Since no device problem was identified affecting distributed product, no pra is required.Since no edwards defects were identified, no corrective or preventative actions are required.The pvl was confirmed based on article imagery.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.It should be noted that the thv was deployed in mitral position containing a ring, which is not an indicated use of the sapien 3 ultra thv with a commander ds in the eu region at the time of implantation.Therefore, this was off-label operation.Per reviewed article, patient underwent ''a valve-in-ring transfemoral percutaneous procedure and a 26 mm edwards sapien 3 ultra valve was implanted.After the valve was released, a severe paravalvular leak coming from the lateral side was observed, probably due to the high position of the sealing skirt in the lateral portion of the stented valve.'' per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a known potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.In this case, article details indicated that the thv might have been seated too high at lateral site upon deployment.If the final position was too atrial, it would prevent the pvl skirt from properly sealing against target site, leading to the reported paravalvular leak.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (malpositioned thv) may have contributed to the complaint event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key16343636
MDR Text Key309269247
Report Number2015691-2023-10714
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750TFX26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/18/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/09/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/13/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-