• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU450
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Zonular Dehiscence (2698)
Date of Event 01/11/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Age, weight, ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Date of event: unknown; requested but not provided.The best estimate date is between (b)(6) 2023.Device evaluation: the suspect iol was received cut in half.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Manufacturing records review for this device shows that the unit was released within specification.No product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the left eye.The capsule was not stable so another johnson and johnson iol (different model, za9003, same diopter) was placed in the sulcus instead.The issue was first identified during a post-operative exam.The patient was originally scheduled for an iol repositioning.The patient's unspecified symptoms lasted for two days.There was no incision enlargement, suture, or vitrectomy required.There was no delay in procedure and no patient injury.The patient is fully recovered.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: feb 2, 2023.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue "explant" and "capsule collapse" could not be confirmed.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key16359139
Report Number3012236936-2023-00329
Device Sequence Number12327520
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748996
UDI-Public(01)05050474748996(17)240303
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/03/2024
Device Model NumberDIU450
Device Catalogue NumberDIU450U245
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/02/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/18/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/10/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/10/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-