• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASONIC BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASONIC BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number BF-UC180F
Medical Device Problem Codes Device Reprocessing Problem (1091); Component Missing (2306)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/17/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation and the customer's allegation was confirmed.The device evaluation found the bending section rubber was damaged due to the cap not being placed correctly on the scope during reprocessing, the bending section rubber was missing, the bending section rubber was damaged during reprocessing, the adhesive on the bending section rubber was detached, and water tightness was lost due to a cut on the bending section rubber.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The customer reported to olympus, the evis exera ii ultrasonic bronchofibervideoscope had the bending rubber become damaged during reprocessing.It was damaged due to the cap not being correctly placed on the scope during reprocessing.There were no reports of patient harm.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, the bending rubber was damaged because the cap was not positioned correctly when reprocessing the scope.Event likely occurred due to handling of the client because there was a description that the cap could not be correctly placed at the time of reprocessing.The event could have be prevented by following the instructions use which state: "caution : always remove the water resistant cap before ethylene oxide gas sterilization.If the water-resistant cap remains attached during ethylene oxide gas sterilization, the air inside the endoscope will expand and could rupture the covering of the bending section and/or damage the angulation mechanism." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASONIC BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
ULTRASONIC BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16364227
Report Number3002808148-2023-01359
Device Sequence Number6748532
Product Code PSV
UDI-Device Identifier04953170341823
UDI-Public04953170341823
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K070983
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberBF-UC180F
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/17/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-